mbox series

[rdma-next,0/2] Extend UAR to have DevX UID

Message ID cover.1631660943.git.leonro@nvidia.com
Headers show
Series Extend UAR to have DevX UID | expand

Message

Leon Romanovsky Sept. 14, 2021, 11:11 p.m. UTC
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

Hi,

This is short series from Meir that adds DevX UID to the UAR.

Thanks

Meir Lichtinger (2):
  net/mlx5: Add uid field to UAR allocation structures
  IB/mlx5: Enable UAR to have DevX UID

 drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cmd.c  | 24 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cmd.h  |  2 ++
 drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h     |  4 +--
 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Comments

Jason Gunthorpe Sept. 15, 2021, 1:47 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 02:11:23AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Meir Lichtinger <meirl@nvidia.com>

> 

> UID field was added to alloc_uar and dealloc_uar PRM command, to specify

> DevX UID for UAR. This change enables firmware validating user access to

> its own UAR resources.

> 

> For the kernel allocated UARs the UID will stay 0 as of today.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Meir Lichtinger <meirl@nvidia.com>

> Reviewed-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>

> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cmd.c  | 24 ++++++++++++++

>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cmd.h  |  2 ++

>  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++--------------

>  3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cmd.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cmd.c

> index a8db8a051170..0fe3c4ceec43 100644

> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cmd.c

> @@ -206,3 +206,27 @@ int mlx5_cmd_mad_ifc(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, const void *inb, void *outb,

>  	kfree(in);

>  	return err;

>  }

> +

> +int mlx5_ib_cmd_uar_alloc(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u32 *uarn, u16 uid)

> +{

> +	u32 out[MLX5_ST_SZ_DW(alloc_uar_out)] = {};

> +	u32 in[MLX5_ST_SZ_DW(alloc_uar_in)] = {};

> +	int err;

> +

> +	MLX5_SET(alloc_uar_in, in, opcode, MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOC_UAR);

> +	MLX5_SET(alloc_uar_in, in, uid, uid);

> +	err = mlx5_cmd_exec_inout(dev, alloc_uar, in, out);

> +	if (!err)

> +		*uarn = MLX5_GET(alloc_uar_out, out, uar);


Success oriented flow:

 if (err)
     return err;
 *uarn = MLX5_GET(alloc_uar_out, out, uar);
 return 0;

And why did we add entirely new functions instead of just adding a uid
argument to the core ones? Or, why doesn't this delete the old core
functions that look unused outside of IB anyhow?

Jason
Leon Romanovsky Sept. 20, 2021, 1:21 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:47:53AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 02:11:23AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:

> > From: Meir Lichtinger <meirl@nvidia.com>

> > 

> > UID field was added to alloc_uar and dealloc_uar PRM command, to specify

> > DevX UID for UAR. This change enables firmware validating user access to

> > its own UAR resources.

> > 

> > For the kernel allocated UARs the UID will stay 0 as of today.

> > 

> > Signed-off-by: Meir Lichtinger <meirl@nvidia.com>

> > Reviewed-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>

> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cmd.c  | 24 ++++++++++++++

> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cmd.h  |  2 ++

> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++--------------

> >  3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

> > 

> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cmd.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cmd.c

> > index a8db8a051170..0fe3c4ceec43 100644

> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cmd.c

> > @@ -206,3 +206,27 @@ int mlx5_cmd_mad_ifc(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, const void *inb, void *outb,

> >  	kfree(in);

> >  	return err;

> >  }

> > +

> > +int mlx5_ib_cmd_uar_alloc(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u32 *uarn, u16 uid)

> > +{

> > +	u32 out[MLX5_ST_SZ_DW(alloc_uar_out)] = {};

> > +	u32 in[MLX5_ST_SZ_DW(alloc_uar_in)] = {};

> > +	int err;

> > +

> > +	MLX5_SET(alloc_uar_in, in, opcode, MLX5_CMD_OP_ALLOC_UAR);

> > +	MLX5_SET(alloc_uar_in, in, uid, uid);

> > +	err = mlx5_cmd_exec_inout(dev, alloc_uar, in, out);

> > +	if (!err)

> > +		*uarn = MLX5_GET(alloc_uar_out, out, uar);

> 

> Success oriented flow:

> 

>  if (err)

>      return err;

>  *uarn = MLX5_GET(alloc_uar_out, out, uar);

>  return 0;

> 

> And why did we add entirely new functions instead of just adding a uid

> argument to the core ones? Or, why doesn't this delete the old core

> functions that look unused outside of IB anyhow?


We didn't want to add not-needed for mlx5_core uid field, the rest
comments are valid and I'm sorry that I missed them.

Thanks

> 

> Jason