From patchwork Thu Jun 10 07:19:59 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "huangguangbin \(A\)" X-Patchwork-Id: 458361 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C358AC47094 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 07:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5B96140F for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 07:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230353AbhFJHZ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:25:29 -0400 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]:5316 "EHLO szxga08-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230203AbhFJHZM (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:25:12 -0400 Received: from dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4G0wLP41SZz1BKjl; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:18:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggemi759-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.145) by dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:23:14 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.67.165.24) by dggemi759-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:23:14 +0800 From: Guangbin Huang To: , , , , CC: , , , Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/8] net: ixp4xx_hss: add blank line after declarations Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:19:59 +0800 Message-ID: <1623309605-15671-3-git-send-email-huangguangbin2@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.1 In-Reply-To: <1623309605-15671-1-git-send-email-huangguangbin2@huawei.com> References: <1623309605-15671-1-git-send-email-huangguangbin2@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.165.24] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To dggemi759-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.145) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Peng Li This patch fixes the checkpatch error about missing a blank line after declarations. Signed-off-by: Peng Li Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang --- drivers/net/wan/ixp4xx_hss.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/ixp4xx_hss.c b/drivers/net/wan/ixp4xx_hss.c index 2c135a9..6aa01d5 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wan/ixp4xx_hss.c +++ b/drivers/net/wan/ixp4xx_hss.c @@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ static inline struct port* dev_to_port(struct net_device *dev) static inline void memcpy_swab32(u32 *dest, u32 *src, int cnt) { int i; + for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) dest[i] = swab32(src[i]); } @@ -353,6 +354,7 @@ static inline void memcpy_swab32(u32 *dest, u32 *src, int cnt) static void hss_npe_send(struct port *port, struct msg *msg, const char* what) { u32 *val = (u32*)msg; + if (npe_send_message(port->npe, msg, what)) { pr_crit("HSS-%i: unable to send command [%08X:%08X] to %s\n", port->id, val[0], val[1], npe_name(port->npe)); @@ -1006,6 +1008,7 @@ static void destroy_hdlc_queues(struct port *port) for (i = 0; i < RX_DESCS; i++) { struct desc *desc = rx_desc_ptr(port, i); buffer_t *buff = port->rx_buff_tab[i]; + if (buff) { dma_unmap_single(&port->netdev->dev, desc->data, RX_SIZE, @@ -1016,6 +1019,7 @@ static void destroy_hdlc_queues(struct port *port) for (i = 0; i < TX_DESCS; i++) { struct desc *desc = tx_desc_ptr(port, i); buffer_t *buff = port->tx_buff_tab[i]; + if (buff) { dma_unmap_tx(port, desc); free_buffer(buff); @@ -1213,6 +1217,7 @@ static void find_best_clock(u32 timer_freq, u32 rate, u32 *best, u32 *reg) for (b = 0; b < 0x400; b++) { u64 c = (b + 1) * (u64)rate; + do_div(c, timer_freq - rate * a); c--; if (c >= 0xFFF) { /* 12-bit - no need to check more 'b's */