Message ID | 20170717144848.11793-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Current Travis Queue | expand |
On Mon, 07/17 15:48, Alex Bennée wrote: > Hi, > > This is the current status of the travis/next patch queue. The > includes updates from Paolo to allow parallelism while testing in the > docker environment. I've extended the travis image so we can actually > run our travis.py script in the Travis image. > > There are also a number of updates from Phillipe which add a bunch of > additional cross compile targets to our shippable setup. The cachinfo > patch is temporary and won't make the pull as it is already queued in > Richard's tcg-next. > > I'm currently trying to catch one of our Travis hangs in the act > (postcopy-test) but it seems to be very much a heavy load race > condition which annoyingly stops happening once you try and get > debugging tools on it. This is the reason I've updated the travis > docker image to include the debug tools ;-) > > As long as there are no screams of outrage I'll roll a pullreq for > softfreeze tomorrow. Renaming of debian to debian9 seems backward incompatible. We don't care that much, but I'd like to see a commit message justifying the change. Otherwise it looks good to go (minus the cachinfo patch, of course). Fam
Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> writes: > On Mon, 07/17 15:48, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is the current status of the travis/next patch queue. The >> includes updates from Paolo to allow parallelism while testing in the >> docker environment. I've extended the travis image so we can actually >> run our travis.py script in the Travis image. >> >> There are also a number of updates from Phillipe which add a bunch of >> additional cross compile targets to our shippable setup. The cachinfo >> patch is temporary and won't make the pull as it is already queued in >> Richard's tcg-next. >> >> I'm currently trying to catch one of our Travis hangs in the act >> (postcopy-test) but it seems to be very much a heavy load race >> condition which annoyingly stops happening once you try and get >> debugging tools on it. This is the reason I've updated the travis >> docker image to include the debug tools ;-) >> >> As long as there are no screams of outrage I'll roll a pullreq for >> softfreeze tomorrow. > > Renaming of debian to debian9 seems backward incompatible. We don't care that > much, but I'd like to see a commit message justifying the change. Otherwise it > looks good to go (minus the cachinfo patch, of course). Well originally we were basing off debian-stable but we got caught out by the new release. With this series we have most things off the latest stable (Debian 9 - aka Stretch) but one or two builds are based of old stable (Debian 8 - aka Jessie) and using the embedian hacks we had before. I think for this it's mostly a matter of clarity. -- Alex Bennée
On Mon, 07/17 23:47, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Sorry I messed previous series... just updated last 5 patches of v2.
Please do full respins and don't post as in-reply-to previous versions, this
doesn't make things any easier for maintainers.
Fam