From patchwork Thu May 7 11:58:02 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= X-Patchwork-Id: 283263 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643B8C4724C for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D8502073A for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="NqZQkYSX" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2D8502073A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:44676 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWfFU-0002Xr-5q for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 08:03:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37264) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWfAU-0006Og-9v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 07:58:22 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:56592 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWfAT-00010T-9o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 07:58:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588852700; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cnNQxNLTG/MaX3sowSlZFtncWas/A5GCzE/ggA+m9dY=; b=NqZQkYSXEXHz5VfHt/Ao8swzYslKwZweZStWaNHQhUbqzNHv1UjGOkwCjoYgz1Pj/y8ZyO OKuvU2RMnJ1J5pG4wwvtz+ArDv10GJBCVN07zLSszysaneCXScouxafVB06f255bjes23L cez0WdlPYC/Ovge6QokpMeXnO98hjUQ= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-182-H6U4Sve5NBOKm5W_JBFdwA-1; Thu, 07 May 2020 07:58:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: H6U4Sve5NBOKm5W_JBFdwA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D5D18FE864; Thu, 7 May 2020 11:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [10.36.110.63]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCAD62A42; Thu, 7 May 2020 11:58:14 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PULL 4/5] block: luks: better error message when creating too large files Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 12:58:02 +0100 Message-Id: <20200507115803.1122661-5-berrange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200507115803.1122661-1-berrange@redhat.com> References: <20200507115803.1122661-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.61; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/07 02:00:54 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Maxim Levitsky , =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" From: Maxim Levitsky Currently if you attampt to create too large file with luks you get the following error message: Formatting 'test.luks', fmt=luks size=17592186044416 key-secret=sec0 qemu-img: test.luks: Could not resize file: File too large While for raw format the error message is qemu-img: test.img: The image size is too large for file format 'raw' The reason for this is that qemu-img checks for errono of the failure, and presents the later error when it is -EFBIG However crypto generic code 'swallows' the errno and replaces it with -EIO. As an attempt to make it better, we can make luks driver, detect -EFBIG and in this case present a better error message, which is what this patch does The new error message is: qemu-img: error creating test.luks: The requested file size is too large Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534898 Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé --- block/crypto.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/crypto.c b/block/crypto.c index ca44dae4f7..6b21d6bf6c 100644 --- a/block/crypto.c +++ b/block/crypto.c @@ -104,18 +104,35 @@ static ssize_t block_crypto_init_func(QCryptoBlock *block, Error **errp) { struct BlockCryptoCreateData *data = opaque; + Error *local_error = NULL; + int ret; if (data->size > INT64_MAX || headerlen > INT64_MAX - data->size) { - error_setg(errp, "The requested file size is too large"); - return -EFBIG; + ret = -EFBIG; + goto error; } /* User provided size should reflect amount of space made * available to the guest, so we must take account of that * which will be used by the crypto header */ - return blk_truncate(data->blk, data->size + headerlen, false, - data->prealloc, 0, errp); + ret = blk_truncate(data->blk, data->size + headerlen, false, + data->prealloc, 0, &local_error); + + if (ret >= 0) { + return ret; + } + +error: + if (ret == -EFBIG) { + /* Replace the error message with a better one */ + error_free(local_error); + error_setg(errp, "The requested file size is too large"); + } else { + error_propagate(errp, local_error); + } + + return ret; }