From patchwork Thu Sep 16 16:01:37 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 513634 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6BBC433FE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5452261139 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349812AbhIPRnS (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:43:18 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53756 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1353975AbhIPRh7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:37:59 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C7E56323B; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 16:50:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1631811003; bh=pSP+UXjC7rVAZz0UujF2XPiMPxYn+bkfBlIjOMWvG9Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MrkuFy9UVW3zFbBjYR/STUaCdc4V67tUWCSp5+LCnEzAZV9HwH0kKXMkv1ZjdfVcS HvBnuy5h8OZvwXdxN+Gyn0479GigIG+Zsj7R81QiZ/m8U7sJAB0TWGoE9H6qBVmUgU pUhDiz/llKvzuf6hB0jtbegeBJtbsETE79Y4yEjs= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot , Li Zhijian , Alexei Starovoitov , Song Liu , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.14 348/432] selftests/bpf: Enlarge select() timeout for test_maps Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:01:37 +0200 Message-Id: <20210916155822.621512442@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 In-Reply-To: <20210916155810.813340753@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210916155810.813340753@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Li Zhijian [ Upstream commit 2d82d73da35b72b53fe0d96350a2b8d929d07e42 ] 0Day robot observed that it's easily timeout on a heavy load host. ------------------- # selftests: bpf: test_maps # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete' # Fork 1024 tasks to 'test_update_delete' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_percpu' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_sizes' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_hashmap_walk' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap' # Fork 100 tasks to 'test_arraymap_percpu' # Failed sockmap unexpected timeout not ok 3 selftests: bpf: test_maps # exit=1 # selftests: bpf: test_lru_map # nr_cpus:8 ------------------- Since this test will be scheduled by 0Day to a random host that could have only a few cpus(2-8), enlarge the timeout to avoid a false NG report. In practice, i tried to pin it to only one cpu by 'taskset 0x01 ./test_maps', and knew 10S is likely enough, but i still perfer to a larger value 30. Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Song Liu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210820015556.23276-2-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c index abdfc41f7685..4fd01450a408 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c @@ -985,7 +985,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(unsigned int tasks, void *data) FD_ZERO(&w); FD_SET(sfd[3], &w); - to.tv_sec = 1; + to.tv_sec = 30; to.tv_usec = 0; s = select(sfd[3] + 1, &w, NULL, NULL, &to); if (s == -1) {