Message ID | 20200429130428.124788-1-hws@denx.de |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ARM: imx: Fix reset in SPL | expand |
Hi folks, On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:04 AM Harald Seiler <hws at denx.de> wrote: > > This series is a merge of "ARM: Fix reset in SPL if SYSRESET is not > used" [1] and "ARM: imx: Do not define do_reset() if sysreset is > enabled" [2] as the two solve the same problem. > > The first of the two was sent to originally to fix a problem not related > to imx8m (see the last patch of this new series, "ARM: reset: use > do_reset in SPL/TPL if SYSRESET was not enabled for them"). However, > this broke imx8m boards as they define do_reset() in board code which > was the reason for adding the imx8m patches. > > Now, Marek sent the latter series which solves the specific issues of > the imx8m boards properly by converting them to use DM_SYSRESET in SPL. > > This approach is better than what Claudius and I did originally so I've > dropped our (non-DM) fixes for the imx8m boards and added Marek's > patches instead. I have, however, kept the fixes for the generic code > so if anyone would go back to using the non-DM version, it would also > work (and not be part of the tree while silently being broken). > > [1]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=162379 > [2]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=173249 Nice work! For the entire series: Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com>