From patchwork Thu May 28 15:54:20 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= X-Patchwork-Id: 281748 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F75C433E0 for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 15:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C734B2053B for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 15:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="goPW2Kf8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C734B2053B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:37394 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jeKsS-00057A-1e for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 11:55:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jeKrm-0004E3-6V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 11:54:46 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:48402 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jeKrk-0006ko-Pb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2020 11:54:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1590681283; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NLDeMVeHTEtmE5icNkCNL/NkDU3Z/mFmRdf8dGeCEWE=; b=goPW2Kf8XjdgGFU/gG1lWa1p/BcSCRv+fjK7ykiJ6zXACBUuZKPYUuYjYrbn5bkeXx+TnB EJjBU2jF0MEaJvJdGwg7c2I8lPHgSQ3kJhfPxpT0TBHtXMDfRNkTyuDMxoQviHBsSlK2de aneyJVHiqd7Me3rp9nuQSVKkN06j30Q= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-395-3SPq8Op5PsSDrPt4F1UNRg-1; Thu, 28 May 2020 11:54:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 3SPq8Op5PsSDrPt4F1UNRg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id s7so6232606wrm.16 for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 08:54:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NLDeMVeHTEtmE5icNkCNL/NkDU3Z/mFmRdf8dGeCEWE=; b=abVymT2xn6yHXHuR8ge/p5Ho+Je2tzk5l103WwJstLLVTdlqq7V0TGpRt4uSfXZVU3 bNARg76DROfVpUL//NGI13wiMi0KaHzaheYb65vOLZFq+d9sEHKilgFffHV8+a/ROQd5 XCgfaPY+S5oGRBHfHw8DylusrsLKy9qDv4Oy1nC5jBn4A2zuXScXhfRDQGC2OhD5TaxY Mol9LPdSHQOaUL1BD1a3EFtw8KlcelamL5F38Y22Ffg0A5o/CVf73+fbRJ0Ur9TJo+hn hOCgFkEAt7i3PUdQ8jR1TrrEqxaueThfFb5uK8umFViz4oY2CzY4q2yMbBPWoZ7pyq7M 2tSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tS6/CFqerEJIQjzr967QB790wCJtfIgNXbZ28lLUN/q62TnHV W/GQrhHnaoRBl2trrXTX2ZzleOtmTPyLmTu9vXYiyvVsxJ5ysT+yU0pwT3n69U3QqX3DqmgtlAT b4DR7ucmpbaPbSHE= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1f85:: with SMTP id f127mr3871034wmf.163.1590681263859; Thu, 28 May 2020 08:54:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4dWggKQVz3hX3eDgorARLdIW+Vf4BQ9ZpfNW4sVGZMx9krgAJdYlsAympr08dD+yaz5Oxqw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1f85:: with SMTP id f127mr3871014wmf.163.1590681263629; Thu, 28 May 2020 08:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (71.red-88-21-204.staticip.rima-tde.net. [88.21.204.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w17sm4212680wra.71.2020.05.28.08.54.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 28 May 2020 08:54:22 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v3] fpu/softfloat: Silence 'bitwise negation of boolean expression' warning Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 17:54:20 +0200 Message-Id: <20200528155420.9802-1-philmd@redhat.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.120; envelope-from=philmd@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/28 03:11:04 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Richard Henderson , =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn?= =?utf-8?b?w6ll?= , Aurelien Jarno Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" When building with clang version 10.0.0-4ubuntu1, we get: CC lm32-softmmu/fpu/softfloat.o fpu/softfloat.c:3365:13: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation] absZ &= ~ ( ( ( roundBits ^ 0x40 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven ); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fpu/softfloat.c:3423:18: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation] absZ0 &= ~ ( ( (uint64_t) ( absZ1<<1 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven ); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ... fpu/softfloat.c:4273:18: error: bitwise negation of a boolean expression; did you mean logical negation? [-Werror,-Wbool-operation] zSig1 &= ~ ( ( zSig2 + zSig2 == 0 ) & roundNearestEven ); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Fix by rewriting the fishy bitwise AND of two bools as an int. Suggested-by: Eric Blake Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881004 Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé --- v3: remove parenthesis --- fpu/softfloat.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/fpu/softfloat.c b/fpu/softfloat.c index 6c8f2d597a..5e9746c287 100644 --- a/fpu/softfloat.c +++ b/fpu/softfloat.c @@ -3362,7 +3362,9 @@ static int32_t roundAndPackInt32(bool zSign, uint64_t absZ, } roundBits = absZ & 0x7F; absZ = ( absZ + roundIncrement )>>7; - absZ &= ~ ( ( ( roundBits ^ 0x40 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven ); + if (!(roundBits ^ 0x40) && roundNearestEven) { + absZ &= ~1; + } z = absZ; if ( zSign ) z = - z; if ( ( absZ>>32 ) || ( z && ( ( z < 0 ) ^ zSign ) ) ) { @@ -3420,7 +3422,9 @@ static int64_t roundAndPackInt64(bool zSign, uint64_t absZ0, uint64_t absZ1, if ( increment ) { ++absZ0; if ( absZ0 == 0 ) goto overflow; - absZ0 &= ~ ( ( (uint64_t) ( absZ1<<1 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven ); + if (!(absZ1 << 1) && roundNearestEven) { + absZ0 &= ~1; + } } z = absZ0; if ( zSign ) z = - z; @@ -3480,7 +3484,9 @@ static int64_t roundAndPackUint64(bool zSign, uint64_t absZ0, float_raise(float_flag_invalid, status); return UINT64_MAX; } - absZ0 &= ~(((uint64_t)(absZ1<<1) == 0) & roundNearestEven); + if (!(absZ1 << 1) && roundNearestEven) { + absZ0 &= ~1; + } } if (zSign && absZ0) { @@ -3603,7 +3609,9 @@ static float32 roundAndPackFloat32(bool zSign, int zExp, uint32_t zSig, status->float_exception_flags |= float_flag_inexact; } zSig = ( zSig + roundIncrement )>>7; - zSig &= ~ ( ( ( roundBits ^ 0x40 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven ); + if (!(roundBits ^ 0x40) && roundNearestEven) { + zSig &= ~1; + } if ( zSig == 0 ) zExp = 0; return packFloat32( zSign, zExp, zSig ); @@ -3757,7 +3765,9 @@ static float64 roundAndPackFloat64(bool zSign, int zExp, uint64_t zSig, status->float_exception_flags |= float_flag_inexact; } zSig = ( zSig + roundIncrement )>>10; - zSig &= ~ ( ( ( roundBits ^ 0x200 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven ); + if (!(roundBits ^ 0x200) && roundNearestEven) { + zSig &= ~1; + } if ( zSig == 0 ) zExp = 0; return packFloat64( zSign, zExp, zSig ); @@ -3983,8 +3993,9 @@ floatx80 roundAndPackFloatx80(int8_t roundingPrecision, bool zSign, } if ( increment ) { ++zSig0; - zSig0 &= - ~ ( ( (uint64_t) ( zSig1<<1 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven ); + if (!(zSig1 << 1) && roundNearestEven) { + zSig0 &= ~1; + } if ( (int64_t) zSig0 < 0 ) zExp = 1; } return packFloatx80( zSign, zExp, zSig0 ); @@ -4000,7 +4011,9 @@ floatx80 roundAndPackFloatx80(int8_t roundingPrecision, bool zSign, zSig0 = UINT64_C(0x8000000000000000); } else { - zSig0 &= ~ ( ( (uint64_t) ( zSig1<<1 ) == 0 ) & roundNearestEven ); + if (!(zSig1 << 1) && roundNearestEven) { + zSig0 &= ~1; + } } } else { @@ -4270,7 +4283,9 @@ static float128 roundAndPackFloat128(bool zSign, int32_t zExp, } if ( increment ) { add128( zSig0, zSig1, 0, 1, &zSig0, &zSig1 ); - zSig1 &= ~ ( ( zSig2 + zSig2 == 0 ) & roundNearestEven ); + if ((zSig2 + zSig2 == 0) && roundNearestEven) { + zSig1 &= ~1; + } } else { if ( ( zSig0 | zSig1 ) == 0 ) zExp = 0;